I recieved the book a while back, it's really very good and is what I expected it would be like... however I still think Cradle of Filth/Dani should write a proper Autobiography of the band including every possible detail.
One thing that dissapointed me a fair bit in the book and that looked very petty to me was when they said that Gian replaced Paul after he left... everyone knows it was Stuart who replaced Paul, Gian didn't even join the band until after Dusk was recorded. I found the general ignorance of Stuarts contribution to the band very sad. Stuart pretty much created the COF sound that we all see as the true classic COF. Principle was a great album but it was not by any means close to how fantastic the band became when Stuart joined and (excuse the pun) re-vamped the band's sound to become the biggest selling black metal band on earth. I know Stuart didn't write allot of the songs on Dusk and Vempire but he sure as hell made them better and changed the style of them to something far more grand and atmospheric. I believe a far bigger credit is due to Stuart... He may have had a reputation for not being a very easy man to work with but as a musician he was flawless. It's a shame he is under a legal gagging clause that prevents him speaking out about the events during his 'removal' from the band, as I would very much like to hear what he has to say about it all.
On the subject of the new hardback edition of The Gospel Of Filth... It's good that it has been made available for those who missed out, though including the extra chapter in that one as well is a bit cheeky considering they said that chapter was for the first edition only!
Bring on a proper Autobiography I say... I really loved reading the chapter about the bands tour antics in The Gospel. I'd like to read more tales of the early days, the studio times, older tours, old members etc...
actually. paul ryan wrote all of dusk and vempire.
but then he left. so they re-worked dusk.
stuart just wrote stuff for cruelty
then he left.
I'm okay with people getting a copy, but it's just the idea there getting the same thing we paid for but in a different style. In a weird way it's like we got ripped off, for the simple fact why sell us a book and turn and around sell the same thing but a different cover. And it almost make's the value of our books go down.
doomflower said:I was under the same impression as you. WTF indeed.
filthy113 said:http://www.fabpress.com/vsearch.php?CO=FAB104
So if I'm reading the info correct off this page. This book is the same as the special edition just with a blue hardback cover.
Wasn't the idea of the special edition to be just that? Not sell it cheaper but with some strange blue cover which isn't bad but you get what I'm saying, WTF???
I just feel very wronged And very outraged, but trying to stay calm and not go nuts.
doomflower said:My sentiments exactly. I am a little vexed about it, to be entirely honest.
filthy113 said:I'm okay with people getting a copy, but it's just the idea there getting the same thing we paid for but in a different style. In a weird way it's like we got ripped off, for the simple fact why sell us a book and turn and around sell the same thing but a different cover. And it almost make's the value of our books go down.
doomflower said:I was under the same impression as you. WTF indeed.
filthy113 said:http://www.fabpress.com/vsearch.php?CO=FAB104
So if I'm reading the info correct off this page. This book is the same as the special edition just with a blue hardback cover.
Wasn't the idea of the special edition to be just that? Not sell it cheaper but with some strange blue cover which isn't bad but you get what I'm saying, WTF???
© 2012 Created by ADMIN.
