Last Film Seen...

Just though I'd make a discussion on what was your most recent film you've seen.. and then you guys could maybe type a brief plot line of the movie and then give your review, on how good you thought the movie was.

Transformers : Dark Of The Moon = Best Movie Of 2011

 

That's all I have to say..
I suggest ALL of you to see it...

 

Even better than the blockbuster hit Battle : Los Angeles ;)

Views: 10398

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Psychoscot on June 22, 2012 at 22:37

Orgazmo is hilarious!

BETO said:

yeah and at the end i watched orgazmo, a comedy with ron jeremy


Psychoscot said:

Brilliant film!, recently bought the restored boxset! 

Fobos said:

Permalink Reply by Nutsack of Filth on June 22, 2012 at 22:58

Why say Ron Jeremy?  He's only in it for about five minutes - surely it'd be better to say "by and starring the South Park guys".

Anyway, yeah, it's good.  Cannibal! The Musical is also worth watching.



BETO said:

yeah and at the end i watched orgazmo, a comedy with ron jeremy
Permalink Reply by Nutsack of Filth on June 22, 2012 at 23:01

I got it as soon as it came out - it's fucking absurd that it took this long to get a proper home video release and it's STILL cut.  I honestly don't know what Warner Bros' problem with it is.

The dumbest thing is that you can watch most of the cut footage easily online and it's featured in several documentaries about censorship, but they still won't put it back in the film.  Even the documentary which is featured on the DVD which details how Mark Kermode found the cut footage and then showed it back to Ken Russell has had the footage itself cut out.

Psychoscot said:

Brilliant film!, recently bought the restored boxset! 

Permalink Reply by Cassandra on June 22, 2012 at 23:05

Liar Liar and Some Like it Hot

Permalink Reply by Nutsack of Filth on June 22, 2012 at 23:08

I rewatched Lilya 4-Ever last night.  It makes me extremely angry and sad every time I see it, it's really quite good:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40m_yeQRGNk

Permalink Reply by Psychoscot on June 23, 2012 at 0:49

I really don't know what Warners problems is! They just seem to point blank refuse to allow it. Considering the level of graphic nudity and violence now out there on many modern day films it seems utterly absurd that they won't allow a full uncut version of the film to be released. It's not going to corrupt anyone as those that would wish the film uncut tend to be older or are film buffs.

Dradle of Filth said:

I got it as soon as it came out - it's fucking absurd that it took this long to get a proper home video release and it's STILL cut.  I honestly don't know what Warner Bros' problem with it is.

The dumbest thing is that you can watch most of the cut footage easily online and it's featured in several documentaries about censorship, but they still won't put it back in the film.  Even the documentary which is featured on the DVD which details how Mark Kermode found the cut footage and then showed it back to Ken Russell has had the footage itself cut out.

Psychoscot said:

Brilliant film!, recently bought the restored boxset! 

Permalink Reply by Nutsack of Filth on June 23, 2012 at 2:03

It's that "Rape of Christ" bit they really don't like (even though you can find it easily on YouTube now and it's even been (badly) reinserted into the version of the film Fobos posted here).  And a bit where it's implied Vanessa Redgrave buffs herself with Oliver Reed's burnt bone.

Not even the people who were responsible for the reissue seem to know why Warner Bros dislike it so much.  It's not even like it's blasphemous, if anything it's anti-blasphemy.



Psychoscot said:

I really don't know what Warners problems is! They just seem to point blank refuse to allow it. Considering the level of graphic nudity and violence now out there on many modern day films it seems utterly absurd that they won't allow a full uncut version of the film to be released. It's not going to corrupt anyone as those that would wish the film uncut tend to be older or are film buffs.

Permalink Reply by Psychoscot on June 23, 2012 at 2:12

Considering Warners are proud to own The Exorcist and all it's sequels, it's a bit rich to condemn these scenes! Unless of course the company is run by dirty old men that find a possessed 11 year old fucking herself with a crucifix a turn on! It seems to be the case that when originally cut, they were marked as "never to be put back" 

Dradle of Filth said:

It's that "Rape of Christ" bit they really don't like (even though you can find it easily on YouTube now and it's even been (badly) reinserted into the version of the film Fobos posted here).  And a bit where it's implied Vanessa Redgrave buffs herself with Oliver Reed's burnt bone.

Not even the people who were responsible for the reissue seem to know why Warner Bros dislike it so much.  It's not even like it's blasphemous, if anything it's anti-blasphemy.



Psychoscot said:

I really don't know what Warners problems is! They just seem to point blank refuse to allow it. Considering the level of graphic nudity and violence now out there on many modern day films it seems utterly absurd that they won't allow a full uncut version of the film to be released. It's not going to corrupt anyone as those that would wish the film uncut tend to be older or are film buffs.

Permalink Reply by BETO on June 23, 2012 at 6:23
nah, ron jeremy always be the star over the south park guys, he's got a lot of history!


Dradle of Filth said:

Why say Ron Jeremy?  He's only in it for about five minutes - surely it'd be better to say "by and starring the South Park guys".

Anyway, yeah, it's good.  Cannibal! The Musical is also worth watching.



BETO said:

yeah and at the end i watched orgazmo, a comedy with ron jeremy
Permalink Reply by Dark Ill on June 23, 2012 at 10:37

Yep,it´s unique,i think they should re-make it with the hottest actors.

Psychoscot said:

Brilliant film!, recently bought the restored boxset! 

Fobos said:

Permalink Reply by Kevin Hall on June 23, 2012 at 13:07

Was really controversial for it's time ... groundbreaking and if I remember you had to go to those specialist"cinemas to see it back then in Australia!

Fobos said:

Yep,it´s unique,i think they should re-make it with the hottest actors.

Psychoscot said:

Brilliant film!, recently bought the restored boxset! 

Fobos said:

Permalink Reply by Psychoscot on June 23, 2012 at 18:46

It's a film that should never be remade!

Fobos said:

Yep,it´s unique,i think they should re-make it with the hottest actors.

Psychoscot said:

Brilliant film!, recently bought the restored boxset! 

Fobos said:

▶ Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2013   Created by ADMIN.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service