What is good/bad about the album. Opinions?
Personally this album blew me the hell away. When they first released the song Tragic Kingdom I basically died in awe.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by J-F on August 18, 2010 at 4:14
Permalink Reply by Scott Milliorn on August 18, 2010 at 4:20
Permalink Reply by Hydra 666 on August 18, 2010 at 4:20
Permalink Reply by Hydra 666 on August 18, 2010 at 4:29 It felt more similar to Midian (and Damnation, to an exent) to me. Purely in terms of sound and ambience. Cruelty and Dusk both had far more "slow" songs and slow passages within songs, whereas Godspeed is more like Midian and Damnation in that it often maintains a fast tempo.
Electronegative said:I dont see how it was a reminescent of Midian, I think more Cruelty and Nymphetamine with some Dusk.
Permalink Reply by House Atlantic on August 18, 2010 at 12:15
Permalink Reply by HELLHOUND on August 18, 2010 at 14:43 His vocals in that album were so good! It sounded demonic and so natural. Guitar was great, I mostly compare it to Principle actually. One thing about it was that it did get a bit repetitive, but the special edition corrected that problem IMO.
Permalink Reply by J-F on August 18, 2010 at 15:11
Permalink Reply by Kevin Hall on August 18, 2010 at 15:36 I really miss the deep spoken vocals like he used to do on the earlier albums. Like on the first verse of Funeral In Carpathia, the start of Queen Of Winter Throned, the first verse of Cruelty Brought Thee Orchids etc...
Permalink Reply by Hydra 666 on August 18, 2010 at 15:43 My thoughts exactly... Dani was really into this album, he tried his best to sound as good as possible and he did it with focus and passion... Godspeed was about himself and he seemed really pleased with it.
Michael Horne said:His vocals in that album were so good! It sounded demonic and so natural. Guitar was great, I mostly compare it to Principle actually. One thing about it was that it did get a bit repetitive, but the special edition corrected that problem IMO.
© 2012 Created by ADMIN.
