Tags:
Great if Dani should post the original banned artworks on the gospel of filth, all the stuff never made it on the official releases.

I read somewhere this cover was on the 'First day cover' - it can be this with that title -, the special edition with a slipcase. It's limited to 10 000 copies, I guess.
The banned Thornography cover had very little difference to the finished version. The skirt was shorter on the original, apparently, so they just lengthened it. Presumably a lot of retailers refused to stock it when that much leg was shown. A bit stupid really considering there are much MUCH more explicit album covers out there.
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news/CRADLE-OF-THORNS-FILTHY-PORNO...
Read this old interview.
"J: There was a little controversy with the art, right?
D: Apparently... it's only a few variants on it, really, it's pretty much the same thing. There was a corpse on the ground, some stuff in the background, some insinuations they didn't like... and I think the woman's legs were naked. The changes were very minor."
I've also read a lot of interviews where they only mentioned the skirt, but this one gives a little more information...
now that they are on Peaceville records i hope we can see again true COF cover art work on the new release, uncensored.
BETO said:now that they are on Peaceville records i hope we can see again true COF cover art work on the new release, uncensored.
Yes! Lets bring the tits back! Lol
But seriously, it would be nice to see that for old times sake.
© 2012 Created by ADMIN.
